Difference between low-volume and high-volume Andersen samplers in measuring atmospheric aerosols_中国颗粒学会

在线阅读

Volurnes 72-75 (2023)

Volurnes 60-71 (2022)

Volurnes 54-59 (2021)

Volurnes 48-53 (2020)

Volurnes 42-47 (2019)

Volurnes 36-41 (2018)

Volurnes 30-35 (2017)

Volurnes 24-29 (2016)

Volurnes 18-23 (2015)

Volurnes 12-17 (2014)

Volurne 11 (2013)

Volurne 10 (2012)

Volurne 9 (2011)

Volurne 8 (2010)

Volurne 7 (2009)

Volurne 6 (2008)

Volurne 5 (2007)

Volurne 4 (2006)

Volurne 3 (2005)

Volurne 2 (2004)

Volurne 1 (2003)

在线阅读

Partic. vol. 6 no. 3 pp. 218-222 (June 2008)
doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2008.01.005

Research Note

Difference between low-volume and high-volume Andersen samplers in measuring atmospheric aerosols

Fengfu Fua, b, *, Nobuo Shinohayab, Mitsuo Itob, Xueqin Xua, Mincong Shena, Liangjun Xua

Show more

fengfu@fzu.edu.cn

Abstract

The mass concentration and size distribution of aerosols in Tokaimura were investigated using a high-volume and a low-volume Andersen sampler. A difference was found using the two samplers: the concentration of total aerosols determined with the high-volume sampler is smaller than that of the low-volume sampler by 70–90% throughout the year. Compared to the high-volume sampler, low-volume sampler gave lower concentration for aerosols >7 μm, higher concentration for aerosols of 3.3–7.0 μm and <1.1 μm, though similar results for aerosols of 1.1–3.3 μm. The low-volume sampler was found to have better separation efficiency and higher accuracy.

Keywords

Aerosols; Cascade impactor; Andersen air sampler; Atmospheric particles