Comparative analysis of CFD models for jetting fluidized beds: Effect of particle-phase viscosity_中国颗粒学会

在线阅读

Volurnes 72-75 (2023)

Volurnes 60-71 (2022)

Volurnes 54-59 (2021)

Volurnes 48-53 (2020)

Volurnes 42-47 (2019)

Volurnes 36-41 (2018)

Volurnes 30-35 (2017)

Volurnes 24-29 (2016)

Volurnes 18-23 (2015)

Volurnes 12-17 (2014)

Volurne 11 (2013)

Volurne 10 (2012)

Volurne 9 (2011)

Volurne 8 (2010)

Volurne 7 (2009)

Volurne 6 (2008)

Volurne 5 (2007)

Volurne 4 (2006)

Volurne 3 (2005)

Volurne 2 (2004)

Volurne 1 (2003)

在线阅读

Partic. vol. 10 no. 4 pp. 444-449 (August 2012)
doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2012.03.002

Comparative analysis of CFD models for jetting fluidized beds: Effect of particle-phase viscosity

Pei Peia, Kai Zhangb, *, Gang Xub, Yongping Yangb, Dongsheng Wenc

Show more

kzhang@ncepu.edu.cn

Highlights

    ► The effect of particulate rheology on jetting dynamics in a fluidized bed is investigated. ► Different viscosity model are examined and compared with the experiments. ► Constant viscosity model with particle viscosity of 0.10–1.00 Pa s is in agreement with the experiments. ► A simple two-fluid model with zero particle viscosity can predict jetting behaviors.

Abstract

Under the Eulerian–Eulerian framework of simulating gas–solid two-phase flow, the accuracy of the hydrodynamic prediction is strongly affected by the selection of rheology of the particulate phase, for which a detailed assessment is still absent. Using a jetting fluidized bed as an example, this work investigates the influence of solid rheology on the hydrodynamic behavior by employing different particle-phase viscosity models. Both constant particle-phase viscosity model (CVM) with different viscosity values and a simple two-fluid model without particle-phase viscosity (NVM) are incorporated into the classical two-fluid model and compared with the experimental measurements. Qualitative and quantitative results show that the jet penetration depth, jet frequency and averaged bed pressure drop are not a strong function of the particle-phase viscosity. Compared to CVM, the NVM exhibits better predictions on the jet behaviors, which is more suitable for investigating the hydrodynamics of gas–solid fluidized bed with a central jet.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Jetting fluidized bed; Hydrodynamics; CFD; Eulerian–Eulerian model; Particle phase viscosity