Evaluation of the effect of wall boundary conditions on numerical simulations of circulating fluidized beds_中国颗粒学会

在线阅读

Volurnes 72-75 (2023)

Volurnes 60-71 (2022)

Volurnes 54-59 (2021)

Volurnes 48-53 (2020)

Volurnes 42-47 (2019)

Volurnes 36-41 (2018)

Volurnes 30-35 (2017)

Volurnes 24-29 (2016)

Volurnes 18-23 (2015)

Volurnes 12-17 (2014)

Volurne 11 (2013)

Volurne 10 (2012)

Volurne 9 (2011)

Volurne 8 (2010)

Volurne 7 (2009)

Volurne 6 (2008)

Volurne 5 (2007)

Volurne 4 (2006)

Volurne 3 (2005)

Volurne 2 (2004)

Volurne 1 (2003)

在线阅读

Partic. vol. 13 pp. 114-123 (April 2014)
doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2013.04.007

Evaluation of the effect of wall boundary conditions on numerical simulations of circulating fluidized beds

Lei Konga, Chao Zhangaa,*, Jesse Zhub

Show more

czhang@eng.uwo.ca

Highlights

    • A 2D circulating fluidized bed riser system is modeled. • The specularity coefficient has a strong effect on the solid particle distribution near the wall. • The particle–wall restitution coefficient has less effect on solid particle distribution near the wall than that of specularity coefficient. • The specularity and particle–wall restitution coefficients affect the lateral velocity of the solid particles near the wall.

Abstract

A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of the gas–solids two-phase flow in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) riser is carried out. The Eularian–Eularian method with the kinetic theory of granular flow is used to solve the gas–solids two-phase flow in the CFB riser. The wall boundary condition of the riser is defined based on the Johnson and Jackson wall boundary theory (Johnson & Jackson, 1987) with specularity coefficient and particle–wall restitution coefficient. The numerical results show that these two coefficients in the wall boundary condition play a major role in the predicted solids lateral velocity, which affects the solid particle distribution in the CFB riser. And the effect of each of the two coefficients on the solids distribution also depends on the other one. The generality of the CFD model is further validated under different operating conditions of the CFB riser.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CFD; Circulating fluidized bed; Gas–solids two-phase flow; Wall boundary condition; Specularity coefficient; Particle–wall restitution coefficient